Suno
AI Music Generator That Writes, Sings and Produces
The song generator with genuine editing tools: repaint a section, extend, remix, save your own voices. Same price as its rival, but the label settlements make its terms worth checking before you commit.

Udio turns a description into a complete song — vocals, instruments, arrangement — and then, unusually for this category, lets you go back in and change part of it. That second half is the reason people who take music seriously tend to prefer it.
It launched within weeks of its main rival and the two have been matched ever since, right down to charging identical prices. The difference is in temperament. Suno is the one that went mainstream; Udio has consistently felt like the one built by people who expected you to want a second pass.
There is also a large complication that has nothing to do with the software, and it is covered further down. Read it before you build anything on this.
The standout feature. Select a section of a finished song — a bad line in the second verse, a transition that does not land — and regenerate only that, with the rest untouched. Everywhere else in generative music, an imperfect track means rolling the dice again and losing everything you liked. Here it means fixing a bar.
If you have ever produced anything, you will recognise immediately why this matters more than a marginally better model. Iteration on a specific problem is what production actually is.
Extend takes a short generation and continues it, forwards or backwards, which is how you build a full arrangement out of a section that worked. Remix reinterprets an existing track while keeping its bones. Together they turn a one-shot generator into something closer to an arrangement tool.
Paid plans open a library of voices and let you save and reuse your own, which is the closest thing here to keeping a consistent singer across a project. Styles work as musical references rather than genre labels — you can blend two, or reduce the influence of one, which is a far more musical control than typing adjectives and hoping.
Paid tiers accept uploaded audio, so a hummed melody, a rough demo or an existing recording can be the starting point rather than a text prompt. This is the feature that moves Udio from a toy for people without instruments to a tool for people with them.
| Plan | Price | Credits | Limits and features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 10 a day, 100 a month | Two generations at once (four songs), only three full-length songs a day, basic features |
| Standard | $10/mo, or $8/mo billed annually | 2,400 a month | No daily cap, three generations at once (six songs), voices, editing, uploads, style references, custom cover art |
| Pro | $30/mo, or $24/mo billed annually | 6,000 a month | Five generations at once (ten songs), every feature including access permissions on your songs |
Those are exactly the prices its main competitor charges, tier for tier, which tells you how closely the two watch each other. Extra credits cost three dollars for a hundred or twenty-five for a thousand, and there is a student discount.
The rule that catches people out is the same on every plan: credits do not roll over. Not on free, not on Standard, not on Pro. A month you barely use is a month you paid for and threw away, so size the plan to your quiet periods and top up when you are busy.
The free tier is real but tightly drawn. Ten credits a day and a hard limit of three full-length songs means you can evaluate the sound and cannot evaluate a workflow. The editing tools — the actual reason to choose Udio — are not on it at all.
Udio was sued by the major record labels in 2024 over the music used to train it. Unlike most such disputes, this one resolved: Universal and Warner both settled and signed licensing agreements, and a new platform trained on licensed music was announced, with artists able to opt in and be paid.
For the industry that is a landmark. For a user it raises a specific question, and it is the one to answer before you rely on this tool: what can you do with the songs you make? Reporting around the agreements describes the licensed platform as a closed environment, where generated music stays inside rather than being exported to streaming services, and describes a limited window during which existing tracks could be downloaded under the earlier terms.
Udio's own site does not currently carry a notice about this, and the existing product continues to operate. That is exactly why you should check the terms attached to your account rather than trusting any article, this one included. If your plan is to release music commercially, confirm in writing that you can export it before you spend a month making it.
None of this is a reason to avoid Udio for private or exploratory work, where it remains excellent. It is a reason not to build a release schedule on assumptions.
The audience the editing tools were built for. Upload a demo, extend a section that worked, repaint the part that did not, keep a consistent voice across a project. This is the closest generative music comes to behaving like a studio.
Hearing your lyric in three treatments, then fixing the one line that ruins the second verse, is a genuinely different way to work than regenerating and hoping. Inpainting is what makes the difference.
If you have tried a one-shot generator and been frustrated that you could not fix the small thing that was wrong, this is the tool built for that frustration.
Private tracks, gifts, experiments, ideas nobody else will hear. The commercial questions above matter far less here, and the product is a pleasure.
There is a free plan with ten credits a day and a hundred a month, no card required, capped at three full-length songs daily. The editing features that distinguish Udio are only on the paid tiers.
Regenerating a selected section of a finished song while leaving the rest intact — so a single bad line can be fixed without losing the take. It is the feature most people choose Udio for.
No. Monthly credits expire at the end of the period on every plan, and the free tier's daily allowance resets daily. Top-up credits are sold separately at three dollars per hundred or twenty-five per thousand.
Check the terms currently attached to your account before assuming so. Following the label settlements, reporting describes the forthcoming licensed platform as one where generated music stays inside it. This is the single most important thing to confirm for yourself.
Identical pricing, comparable audio quality, different philosophy. Udio gives you better editing — particularly inpainting; Suno has the larger community, a workstation on its top tier and a clearer commercial-rights position. Both free tiers exist, so spend an evening on each with the same lyric.
Yes, on paid plans. Upload audio to use as a starting point or as a style reference, which is what makes Udio usable alongside an existing musical practice rather than instead of one.
On craft, Udio is the more serious of the two big AI music tools. Inpainting alone changes what generative music is for — from rolling dice until something works to fixing the thing that did not. For anyone with production instincts, that is worth more than a marginally better first take.
The caveat is not about the software. The label settlements reshaped what this product will be, and the answer to «can I take my song out of here» is the one that decides whether Udio fits your plans. Confirm it for your own account, and if you are only making music for yourself, enjoy the best editing tools in the category.