Retell AI
Build, Test and Run Voice Agents
Voice agents on a stack Bland owns end to end — built for healthcare, insurance and finance. Free tier at $0.14 a minute, plans from $299.

Bland AI builds voice agents for phone calls, and it does so from an unusual position: it owns the entire stack. Speech recognition, reasoning, voice synthesis and telephony all run on Bland's own infrastructure rather than being stitched together from other companies' APIs. The pitch that follows from that is straightforward — nothing about your call leaves the path Bland controls.
This is the strategic bet that separates it from Vapi and Retell, which orchestrate other people's models. Vertical integration costs enormous engineering effort and gives up the ability to adopt whichever voice model sounds best this quarter. In exchange it buys two things that regulated industries care about more than novelty: latency you control end to end, and a compliance story with no third parties in it.
The market has come round to that bet. Bland raised a $50 million Series C in June 2026 led by Dell Technologies Capital, taking total funding past $100 million in under three years, with HubSpot Ventures joining and Emergence Capital — which had led the Series B eighteen months earlier — returning. Fortune reported the detail the founders now tell against themselves: 180 investors passed before someone said yes. The company reports more than 250 enterprise customers and over 175 million calls handled in the previous year.
A pathway is a map of how a call is allowed to go. The agent understands natural speech — callers interrupt, change subject, answer a question two questions early — but the structure underneath decides what can happen next. That combination is the point. A pure prompt handles the interruption gracefully and then forgets it was supposed to verify identity first.
For an insurance claim or a prescription refill, the sequence is not decoration. Somebody wrote it down for a reason, and often a regulator will read it later. Pathways exist so the conversational part can be flexible while the procedural part cannot.
Bland claims roughly 400 milliseconds of response time and contrasts it with an industry average it puts near 1,240 milliseconds. Treat vendor comparisons with the usual scepticism, but the underlying logic holds: every hop between separately hosted models adds delay, and a platform running its own stack has fewer hops to pay for.
Latency is not a vanity metric on a phone call. Below roughly half a second an exchange feels like conversation. Above a second the caller starts talking over the agent, the agent stops to listen, and the call degenerates into the two of you apologising to each other. This is the single most common reason people describe a voice agent as obviously robotic.
The platform lets you run an agent through large batteries of scenarios before it takes a real call — the marketing cites a thousand-plus scenario suite — and monitor live calls once it does. Voice cloning produces a custom voice rather than picking from a stock list, which matters for brands that already have an audio identity.
Integrations cover the systems these calls actually touch: Twilio, Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Zapier and Genesys among others, plus an API for everything else. Enterprise deployments can run in your own VPC or on premises, with a forward-deployed engineer available — an old-fashioned arrangement that tells you exactly which buyer the company is chasing.
Bland prices as a monthly platform fee plus a per-minute rate, and the per-minute rate falls as the platform fee rises. That structure rewards volume and punishes dabbling, which is a deliberate filter.
| Тариф | Platform fee | Per minute | Transfers | Daily calls | Concurrent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | $0 | $0.14 | $0.05/min | 100 | 10 |
| Build | $299/mo | $0.12 | $0.04/min | 2,000 | 50 |
| Scale | $499/mo | $0.11 | $0.03/min | 5,000 | 100 |
| Enterprise | Contracted to volume | Индивидуально | Индивидуально | Без ограничений | Индивидуально |
The Start plan includes two credits and an inbound number the company values at $15 a month, with no card required. The arithmetic on upgrading is easy: moving from Start to Build saves two cents a minute and costs $299, so it pays for itself somewhere around 15,000 minutes a month. Below that the platform fee is buying you concurrency and daily call limits, not a cheaper minute.
Enterprise pricing covers BAAs, SSO, data residency and on-premises deployment. If those words appear in your procurement checklist, that is the only row in the table that applies to you.
Healthcare, insurance and financial services are the stated focus, and the self-hosted stack is the reason. When the compliance question is which third parties process the audio, the answer none is materially easier to defend than a list.
Claims, eligibility, collections, appointment rescheduling in a clinic. These are conversations with a correct outcome, not just a pleasant one, and pathways plus large-scale scenario testing are aimed squarely at them.
The Genesys integration and the on-premises option point at organisations that already run a contact centre and want to retire the press-one-for-billing menu without replacing everything behind it.
Dispatch confirmations, delivery windows, driver check-ins — high volume, low complexity, and painful to staff. The economics work here at almost any per-minute rate because the alternative is a person doing it at three in the morning.
There is a free Start plan with no platform fee, two credits and an inbound phone number, requiring no card. Calls still cost $0.14 a minute, so it is free to keep an agent and not free to run one.
Two different things, and it is worth separating them. Bland runs its own models rather than calling OpenAI or ElevenLabs, which is true on every plan. Separately, enterprise customers can run the platform inside their own VPC or on their own hardware. The first is the product; the second is a contract term.
Bland supports HIPAA, PCI DSS and SOC 2, and offers BAAs on enterprise agreements. Compliance is a property of your deployment and your contract rather than of a logo on a website, so the specifics belong in that conversation.
Vapi orchestrates models you choose and gives you maximum control. Retell wraps a similar architecture in a flow builder with testing and scoring. Bland owns the whole stack and sells the consequences — lower latency, a simpler compliance surface, less flexibility. The choice is mostly about whether your constraint is engineering freedom or audit risk.
Yes. Voice cloning is part of the platform, so an agent can speak in a voice specific to your brand rather than one from a shared library. Get consent from whoever is being cloned in writing before you do it.
The company cites 30 days for enterprise production deployments. That is plausible for a well-scoped inbound use case with an existing integration, and optimistic for anything requiring new systems work on your side.
Bland AI made a harder bet than its competitors: build the whole stack, absorb the cost, and sell what that makes possible. The result is a platform aimed less at developers exploring voice AI and more at organisations that need a phone conversation to go correctly every time, with an auditable answer to where the audio went.
If you are experimenting, the free plan is a fair place to hear what modern voice agents sound like. If you are in healthcare, insurance or finance, this is the platform whose architecture was designed with your compliance review in mind — and that is a much shorter conversation than retrofitting one that was not.